Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol
Meta: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol by about 98% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Meta: Llama 4 Scout charges $0.050000 / $0.100000 per 1M input/output tokens; OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol charges $2.000000 / $10.000000.
| Field | Meta: Llama 4 Scout | OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/Mtok | $0.050000 | $2.000000 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.100000 | $10.000000 |
| Cache read $/Mtok | – | $0.100000 |
| Cache write $/Mtok | – | $2.500000 |
| Input $/Mchar | 0.015047 | 0.563428 |
| Output $/Mchar | 0.030093 | 2.817139 |
| Context window | 131072 | 1050000 |
| Tokenizer | llama3 | o200k |
Price history
Same workload, monthly cost
Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.
| Workload | Meta: Llama 4 Scout | OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Coding agent | $0.53 | $24.00 |
| RAG chat | $0.58 | $32.00 |
| Summarisation (batch) | $0.55 | $28.00 |
| Classification | $0.51 | $21.60 |
| Chat assistant | $0.70 | $52.00 |
| Content generation | $0.90 | $84.00 |
Cite this page
Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol: $0.050000/$0.100000 vs $2.000000/$10.000000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/meta_llama-4-scout-vs-openai_gpt-6.1-sol).
Meta: Llama 4 Scout page | OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol page | Open in calculator