Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Medium (latest)

Meta: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Mistral Medium (latest) by about 98% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Meta: Llama 4 Scout charges $0.050000 / $0.100000 per 1M input/output tokens; Mistral Medium (latest) charges $1.500000 / $7.500000.

FieldMeta: Llama 4 ScoutMistral Medium (latest)
Input $/Mtok$0.050000$1.500000
Output $/Mtok$0.100000$7.500000
Cache read $/Mtok–$0.150000
Cache write $/Mtok––
Input $/Mchar0.0150470.533428
Output $/Mchar0.0300932.667141
Context window131072262144
Tokenizerllama3mistral

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadMeta: Llama 4 ScoutMistral Medium (latest)
Coding agent$0.53$18.00
RAG chat$0.58$24.00
Summarisation (batch)$0.55$21.00
Classification$0.51$16.20
Chat assistant$0.70$39.00
Content generation$0.90$63.00

Cite this page

Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Medium (latest): $0.050000/$0.100000 vs $1.500000/$7.500000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/meta_llama-4-scout-vs-mistral_mistral-medium-2508).

Meta: Llama 4 Scout page | Mistral Medium (latest) page | Open in calculator