Nova Lite (APAC) vs Codestral (latest)

Codestral (latest) is cheaper than Nova Lite (APAC) by about 100% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Nova Lite (APAC) charges $0.060000 / $0.240000 per 1M input/output tokens; Codestral (latest) charges $0.000000 / $0.000000.

FieldNova Lite (APAC)Codestral (latest)
Input $/Mtok$0.060000$0.000000
Output $/Mtok$0.240000$0.000000
Cache read $/Mtok––
Cache write $/Mtok––
Input $/Mcharn/a0.000000
Output $/Mcharn/a0.000000
Context window300000256000
Tokenizer–mistral

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadNova Lite (APAC)Codestral (latest)
Coding agent$0.69$0.00
RAG chat$0.87$0.00
Summarisation (batch)$0.78$0.00
Classification$0.64$0.00
Chat assistant$1.32$0.00
Content generation$2.04$0.00

Cite this page

Nova Lite (APAC) vs Codestral (latest): $0.060000/$0.240000 vs $0.000000/$0.000000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/amazon_nova-lite-vs-mistral_codestral-2501).

Nova Lite (APAC) page | Codestral (latest) page | Open in calculator