Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct is cheaper than Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash by about 100% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct charges $0.000000 / $0.000000 per 1M input/output tokens; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash charges $0.300000 / $2.500000.

FieldQwen3 Coder 480B A35B InstructGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input $/Mtok$0.000000$0.300000
Output $/Mtok$0.000000$2.500000
Cache read $/Mtok–$0.030000
Cache write $/Mtok––
Input $/Mchar0.000000n/a
Output $/Mchar0.000000n/a
Context window2621441048576
Tokenizerqwen2gemini

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadQwen3 Coder 480B A35B InstructGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Coding agent$0.00$4.10
RAG chat$0.00$6.30
Summarisation (batch)$0.00$5.20
Classification$0.00$3.44
Chat assistant$0.00$11.80
Content generation$0.00$20.60

Cite this page

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash: $0.000000/$0.000000 vs $0.300000/$2.500000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/alibaba_qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-vs-google_gemini-2.5-flash).

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct page | Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash page | Open in calculator