Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B is cheaper than Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash by about 12% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B charges $0.230000 / $2.300000 per 1M input/output tokens; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash charges $0.300000 / $2.500000.

FieldQwen: Qwen3 235B A22BGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input $/Mtok$0.230000$0.300000
Output $/Mtok$2.300000$2.500000
Cache read $/Mtok–$0.030000
Cache write $/Mtok––
Input $/Mchar0.069354n/a
Output $/Mchar0.693544n/a
Context window1280001048576
Tokenizerqwen2gemini

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadQwen: Qwen3 235B A22BGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Coding agent$3.33$4.10
RAG chat$5.40$6.30
Summarisation (batch)$4.37$5.20
Classification$2.71$3.44
Chat assistant$10.58$11.80
Content generation$18.86$20.60

Cite this page

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash: $0.230000/$2.300000 vs $0.300000/$2.500000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/alibaba_qwen3-235b-a22b-vs-google_gemini-2.5-flash).

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B page | Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash page | Open in calculator