Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 is cheaper than Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite by about 100% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite charges $0.100000 / $0.400000 per 1M input/output tokens; Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 charges $0.000000 / $0.000000.

FieldGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5
Input $/Mtok$0.100000$0.000000
Output $/Mtok$0.400000$0.000000
Cache read $/Mtok$0.010000–
Cache write $/Mtok––
Input $/Mcharn/a0.000000
Output $/Mcharn/a0.000000
Context window1048576131072
Tokenizergeminillama3

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5
Coding agent$1.15$0.00
RAG chat$1.45$0.00
Summarisation (batch)$1.30$0.00
Classification$1.06$0.00
Chat assistant$2.20$0.00
Content generation$3.40$0.00

Cite this page

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5: $0.100000/$0.400000 vs $0.000000/$0.000000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/google_gemini-2.5-flash-lite-vs-nvidia_nemotron-super-49b-v1).

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite page | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 page | Open in calculator