Command A vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6
Z.ai: GLM 4.6 is cheaper than Command A by about 77% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Command A charges $2.500000 / $10.000000 per 1M input/output tokens; Z.ai: GLM 4.6 charges $0.600000 / $2.200000.
| Field | Command A | Z.ai: GLM 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/Mtok | $2.500000 | $0.600000 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.000000 | $2.200000 |
| Cache read $/Mtok | – | $0.110000 |
| Cache write $/Mtok | – | – |
| Input $/Mchar | n/a | n/a |
| Output $/Mchar | n/a | n/a |
| Context window | 256000 | 202752 |
| Tokenizer | – | – |
Price history
Same workload, monthly cost
Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.
| Workload | Command A | Z.ai: GLM 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Coding agent | $28.75 | $6.80 |
| RAG chat | $36.25 | $8.40 |
| Summarisation (batch) | $32.50 | $7.60 |
| Classification | $26.50 | $6.32 |
| Chat assistant | $55.00 | $12.40 |
| Content generation | $85.00 | $18.80 |
Cite this page
Command A vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6: $2.500000/$10.000000 vs $0.600000/$2.200000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/cohere_command-a-03-2025-vs-zhipu_glm-4.6).