Command A vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Meta: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Command A by about 99% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Command A charges $2.500000 / $10.000000 per 1M input/output tokens; Meta: Llama 4 Scout charges $0.050000 / $0.100000.
| Field | Command A | Meta: Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/Mtok | $2.500000 | $0.050000 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.000000 | $0.100000 |
| Cache read $/Mtok | – | – |
| Cache write $/Mtok | – | – |
| Input $/Mchar | n/a | 0.015047 |
| Output $/Mchar | n/a | 0.030093 |
| Context window | 256000 | 131072 |
| Tokenizer | – | llama3 |
Price history
Same workload, monthly cost
Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.
| Workload | Command A | Meta: Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Coding agent | $28.75 | $0.53 |
| RAG chat | $36.25 | $0.58 |
| Summarisation (batch) | $32.50 | $0.55 |
| Classification | $26.50 | $0.51 |
| Chat assistant | $55.00 | $0.70 |
| Content generation | $85.00 | $0.90 |
Cite this page
Command A vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout: $2.500000/$10.000000 vs $0.050000/$0.100000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/cohere_command-a-03-2025-vs-meta_llama-4-scout).
Command A page | Meta: Llama 4 Scout page | Open in calculator