Command A vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper than Command A by about 81% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Command A charges $2.500000 / $10.000000 per 1M input/output tokens; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash charges $0.300000 / $2.500000.
| Field | Command A | Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/Mtok | $2.500000 | $0.300000 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.000000 | $2.500000 |
| Cache read $/Mtok | – | $0.030000 |
| Cache write $/Mtok | – | – |
| Input $/Mchar | n/a | n/a |
| Output $/Mchar | n/a | n/a |
| Context window | 256000 | 1048576 |
| Tokenizer | – | gemini |
| Confidence? | aggregator | official |
| Source | litellm | official-google |
Confidence: official = vendor pricing page · api = OpenRouter per-host · aggregator = community list, may lag · unreviewed = automatic extraction awaiting review. When sources disagree the most authoritative wins. Details: /methodology#confidence
Price history
Same workload, monthly cost
Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.
| Workload | Command A | Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Coding agent | $28.75 | $4.10 |
| RAG chat | $36.25 | $6.30 |
| Summarisation (batch) | $32.50 | $5.20 |
| Classification | $26.50 | $3.44 |
| Chat assistant | $55.00 | $11.80 |
| Content generation | $85.00 | $20.60 |
Cite this page
Command A vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash: $2.500000/$10.000000 vs $0.300000/$2.500000 per 1M tokens as of 2026-10-04. Token Barometer by Dejan Strbad, https://tokenbarometer.com, data CC BY 4.0. https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/cohere_command-a-03-2025-vs-google_gemini-2.5-flash
Command A page | Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash page | Open in calculator