Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 by about 79% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 charges $2.000000 / $10.000000 per 1M input/output tokens; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash charges $0.300000 / $2.500000.

FieldAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input $/Mtok$2.000000$0.300000
Output $/Mtok$10.000000$2.500000
Cache read $/Mtok$0.200000$0.030000
Cache write $/Mtok$2.500000–
Input $/Mcharn/an/a
Output $/Mcharn/an/a
Context window10000001048576
Tokenizerclaudegemini

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Coding agent$24.00$4.10
RAG chat$32.00$6.30
Summarisation (batch)$28.00$5.20
Classification$21.60$3.44
Chat assistant$52.00$11.80
Content generation$84.00$20.60

Cite this page

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash: $2.000000/$10.000000 vs $0.300000/$2.500000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/anthropic_claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-google_gemini-2.5-flash).

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 page | Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash page | Open in calculator