Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6

Z.ai: GLM 4.6 is cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 by about 83% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 charges $3.000000 / $15.000000 per 1M input/output tokens; Z.ai: GLM 4.6 charges $0.600000 / $2.200000.

FieldAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5Z.ai: GLM 4.6
Input $/Mtok$3.000000$0.600000
Output $/Mtok$15.000000$2.200000
Cache read $/Mtok$0.300000$0.110000
Cache write $/Mtok$3.750000–
Input $/Mcharn/an/a
Output $/Mcharn/an/a
Context window1000000202752
Tokenizerclaude–

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5Z.ai: GLM 4.6
Coding agent$36.00$6.80
RAG chat$48.00$8.40
Summarisation (batch)$42.00$7.60
Classification$32.40$6.32
Chat assistant$78.00$12.40
Content generation$126.00$18.80

Cite this page

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6: $3.000000/$15.000000 vs $0.600000/$2.200000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/anthropic_claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-zhipu_glm-4.6).

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 page | Z.ai: GLM 4.6 page | Open in calculator