Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra by about 60% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 charges $4.000000 / $20.000000 per 1M input/output tokens; OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra charges $10.000000 / $50.000000.

FieldAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra
Input $/Mtok$4.000000$10.000000
Output $/Mtok$20.000000$50.000000
Cache read $/Mtok$0.200000$1.000000
Cache write $/Mtok$5.000000$12.500000
Input $/Mcharn/a2.817139
Output $/Mcharn/a14.085697
Context window10000001050000
Tokenizerclaudeo200k

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra
Coding agent$48.00$120.00
RAG chat$64.00$160.00
Summarisation (batch)$56.00$140.00
Classification$43.20$108.00
Chat assistant$104.00$260.00
Content generation$168.00$420.00

Cite this page

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra: $4.000000/$20.000000 vs $10.000000/$50.000000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/anthropic_claude-opus-5-5-vs-openai_gpt-6-astra).

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 page | OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra page | Open in calculator