Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 vs OpenAI: o3

OpenAI: o3 is cheaper than Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 by about 83% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 charges $10.000000 / $50.000000 per 1M input/output tokens; OpenAI: o3 charges $2.000000 / $8.000000.

FieldAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1OpenAI: o3
Input $/Mtok$10.000000$2.000000
Output $/Mtok$50.000000$8.000000
Cache read $/Mtok$0.250000$0.500000
Cache write $/Mtok$12.500000–
Input $/Mcharn/a0.563428
Output $/Mcharn/a2.253712
Context window1000000200000
Tokenizerclaudeo200k

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1OpenAI: o3
Coding agent$120.00$23.00
RAG chat$160.00$29.00
Summarisation (batch)$140.00$26.00
Classification$108.00$21.20
Chat assistant$260.00$44.00
Content generation$420.00$68.00

Cite this page

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 vs OpenAI: o3: $10.000000/$50.000000 vs $2.000000/$8.000000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/anthropic_claude-fable-5-1-vs-openai_o3).

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 page | OpenAI: o3 page | Open in calculator