Nova Pro (EU) vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Meta: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Nova Pro (EU) by about 96% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Nova Pro (EU) charges $0.800000 / $3.200000 per 1M input/output tokens; Meta: Llama 4 Scout charges $0.050000 / $0.100000.

FieldNova Pro (EU)Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Input $/Mtok$0.800000$0.050000
Output $/Mtok$3.200000$0.100000
Cache read $/Mtok––
Cache write $/Mtok––
Input $/Mcharn/a0.015047
Output $/Mcharn/a0.030093
Context window300000131072
Tokenizer–llama3

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadNova Pro (EU)Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Coding agent$9.20$0.53
RAG chat$11.60$0.58
Summarisation (batch)$10.40$0.55
Classification$8.48$0.51
Chat assistant$17.60$0.70
Content generation$27.20$0.90

Cite this page

Nova Pro (EU) vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout: $0.800000/$3.200000 vs $0.050000/$0.100000 per 1M tokens as of 2026-10-04. Token Barometer by Dejan Strbad, https://tokenbarometer.com, data CC BY 4.0. https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/amazon_nova-pro-vs-meta_llama-4-scout

Nova Pro (EU) page | Meta: Llama 4 Scout page | Open in calculator