Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Meta: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper than Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B by about 92% on a blended (75% input / 25% output) basis. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B charges $0.230000 / $2.300000 per 1M input/output tokens; Meta: Llama 4 Scout charges $0.050000 / $0.100000.

FieldQwen: Qwen3 235B A22BMeta: Llama 4 Scout
Input $/Mtok$0.230000$0.050000
Output $/Mtok$2.300000$0.100000
Cache read $/Mtok––
Cache write $/Mtok––
Input $/Mchar0.0693540.015047
Output $/Mchar0.6935440.030093
Context window128000131072
Tokenizerqwen2llama3

Price history

Same workload, monthly cost

Illustrative monthly cost at 10M tokens/month, split per workload preset. Not a substitute for the calculator, which uses your own volume, cache and batch assumptions.

WorkloadQwen: Qwen3 235B A22BMeta: Llama 4 Scout
Coding agent$3.33$0.53
RAG chat$5.40$0.58
Summarisation (batch)$4.37$0.55
Classification$2.71$0.51
Chat assistant$10.58$0.70
Content generation$18.86$0.90

Cite this page

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout: $0.230000/$2.300000 vs $0.050000/$0.100000 per 1M tokens, as of 2026-10-04 (Token Barometer, https://tokenbarometer.com/compare/alibaba_qwen3-235b-a22b-vs-meta_llama-4-scout).

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B page | Meta: Llama 4 Scout page | Open in calculator